Review
Title |
TF Coil Conductor FDR |
Date |
17 May 2005 |
Cognizant
Engineer |
Mike Kalish |
Responsible Line Manager |
Brad Nelson |
Review Board Chairperson |
Wayne Reiersen |
Review Board Members |
Art Brooks, Frank
Malinowski, Jim Chrzanowski, Brad Nelson, Wayne Reiersen |
Invitees |
Art Brooks, Frank
Malinowski, Irv Zatz, Hutch Neilson, Jerry Levine, Joe Rushinski, Judy
Malsbury, Jim Chrzanowski, Wayne Reiersen, Rod Templon |
Attendees |
Wayne Reiersen, Hutch
Neilson, Joe Rushinski, Mike Kalish, Jim Chrzanowski, Art Brooks, Bob
Simmons, Frank Malinowski, Irving Zatz, Rod Templon |
Charge |
The goal of the
review is to verify that the specification, statement of work, and
drawing are adequate and that the TF Coil design is advanced enough
to release this documentation to procurement so that the conductor
can be ordered. The areas that will be addressed are:
* Is the material specified correct?
* Is the hole big enough?
* Is the copper cross-section big enough?
* Are the yield and ultimate specified for the conductor
appropriate? |
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Presentation
Drawing
Statement of Work
Specification
Chits and Disposition Plan |
Review Board Report |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
1 Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
1Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |