| Review
Title |
Vacuum Vessel Heater Tape
and Thermocouple FDR |
| Date |
27 April 2006 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Paul Goranson |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Brad Nelson |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
Larry Dudek |
|
Review Board Members |
Fred Dahlgren, Tom Brown,
Mike Kalish, George Labik, Brad Nelson |
|
Invitees |
Wayne Reiersen, Paul
Goranson, Mike Cole, Tom Brown, Larry Dudek, Fred Dahlgren, George
Labik, Mike Zarnstorff, Kevin Freudenberg, Mike Viola, John Edwards,
Mike Kalish, Hutch Neilson, Mike Williams, Jerry Levine, Judy Malsbury,
Bob Simmons |
|
Attendees |
Fred Dahlgren, Tom Brown,
Mike Kalish, Larry Dudek, George Labik, Brad Nelson, Jerry Levine, Frank
Malinowski, John Edwards, Mike Viola, Mike Cole, Kevin Freudenberg |
|
Charge |
1. Does the heater tape
and thermocouple selection and placement meet all performance
requirements?
2. Do the heater tapes and thermocouples satisfy envelope,
requirements? Are they compatible wit the cooling tubes,
magnetic loops, mounting hardware, insulation, etc? Can they be
readily installed.
3. Have potential
failure modes been adequately addressed in the design?
4. Is the design
documentation required to procure, fabricate, and install the parts
adequate? |
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Chits and Disposition
|
|
Review Board Report |
 |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
 |
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
None |
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
Goranson presented the
status of the heater tape design. There were seven chits generated and
dispositioned at the review. The heater tape and thermocouple
selection and placement meet the performance requirements. The
heater tapes and thermocouples satisfy envelope requirements and are
compatible with the cooling tubes, magnetic loops, mounting hardware,
insulation. The design documentation required to procure,
fabricate, and install the parts was adequate. The chits
identified some issues with interface details with the cryostat
feed-thrus, power supply requirements, MTBF, protection for the heaters
and TC during installation, and a question of radiation resistance of
the heaters. This review was considered successful pending
resolution of the chits.
|
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
|
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|
