Review
Title |
Solenoid Assembly PDR/FDR |
Date |
06 September 2006 |
Cognizant
Engineer |
Fred Dahlgren |
Responsible Line Manager |
Brad Nelson |
Review Board Chairperson |
Wayne Reiersen |
Review Board Members |
Mike Cole, HM Fan, Art
Brooks, Larry Dudek, Erik Perry, Phil Heitzenroeder |
Invitees |
Tom Brown, Mike Cole, Raki
Ramakrishnan, Fred Dahlgren, Joe Rushinski, HM Fan, Art Brooks, Brad
Nelson, Hutch Neilson, Bob Simmons, Phil Heitzenroeder, Larry Dudek,
Erik Perry, Mike Williams, Jerry Levine, Judy Malsbury, Jeff Makiel,
Greg Pitonak, Mike Zarnstorff, Ron Strykowsky |
Attendees |
Wayne Reiersen, Joe
Rushinski, Tom Brown, Fred Dahlgren, HM Fan, Larry Dudek, Bob Simmons,
Phil Heitzenroeder, Raki Ramakrishnan, Brad Nelson, Mike Cole, Kevin
Freudenberg |
Charge |
· Provide a
comprehensive list of requirements derived from the SRD and show how
those requirements are met in the design of the solenoid assembly.
Establish the adequacy of the PF1A coils as well as the structure
holding them. Structural analyses should be documented in a formal
analysis reported that has been independently checked.
· Interfaces with other WBS elements
should be discussed. It is important that ALL interfacing WBS Managers
are in agreement that the nature, design solution, and documentation of
the interfaces are appropriate for closing out final design of the
solenoid assembly.
· At an FDR, the technical
documentation that will provide the basis for the procurement should be
in hand. At a minimum, fabrication drawings should be complete and ready
for checking. If there is a specification that is needed as part of the
procurement, it should also be available (and approved).
· Provide the specification to be
used as the technical basis for writing the procedure by which the
solenoid assembly will be assembled and tested here at PPPL. The spec
should include inspections and tests required to assure that the
assembly is ready to go. Although this document is not required for the
procurement, I would like to get it in place while we are actively
working on the design. Along with that, I would like to see a discussion
of the assembly sequence envisioned when the solenoid assembly was
designed. The solenoid assembly will be assembled as part of final
machine assembly.
· Cost and schedule updates should
be developed (and provided to Strykowsky ASAP as input for the ongoing
ETC update) consistent with the design being presented.
· Any risks (technical, cost, and
schedule) should be identified and appropriate mitigation plans
discussed. |
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Chits and Disposition
Review Committee Report
Presentation
|
Review Board Report |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
1
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|