| Review
Title |
Field Period Assembly Peer
Review |
| Date |
11 & 12 October 2006 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Mike Cole, Mike Viola, Tom
Brown |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Larry Dudek, Brad Nelson |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
Erik Perry |
|
Review Board Members |
Jim Chrzanowski, Geoff
Gettelfinger |
|
Invitees |
Wayne Reiersen, Tom Brown,
Fred Hurd, Gary Johnson, Jim Chrzanowski, Larry Dudek, Lutz Wegener,
Mike Cole, Mike Viola, Tom McManamy, Torsten Braeuer, Erik Perry, Geoff
Gettelfinger, Simon Anderson, Art Brooks, Bob Simmons, Brad Nelson,
Brent Stratton, Fred Dahlgren, HM Fan, Hutch Neilson, Irv Zatz, Jeff
Makiel, Jerry Levine, Joe Rushinski, Judy Malsbury, Kevin Freudenberg,
Mike Williams, Mike Zarnstorff, Paul Fogarty, Paul Goranson, Phil
Heitzenroeder, Ron Strykowsky, Steve Raftopoulos, Greg Pitonak; Jim
Lyon, David Anderson, Steve Knowlton, Gary Johnson |
|
Attendees |
Wayne Reiersen, Mike Viola, John
Edwards, Art Brooks, Tom Brown, Phil Heitzenroeder, Geoff Gettelfinger, Jim
Chrzanowski, Jeff Makiel, Judy Malsbury, Joe Rushinski, HM Fan, Bob Simmons,
John Boscoe, Irving Zatz, Ron Strykowsky, Greg Pitonak, Steve Raftopoulos,
Cynthia Phillips |
|
Charge |
The purpose of the meeting is to
assure that our approach to field period assembly is feasible, that the
tooling design and metrology provisions are suitable, dimensional control
requirements are realizable, and the schedule and resources appropriate.
Erik Perry (PPPL) has agreed to chair the review. We have invited Lutz
Wegener, Fred Hurd, and Torsten Braeuer from W7-X; David Anderson and Simon
Anderson from HSX; Steve Knowlton from CTH; and Gary Johnson and Tom
McManamy from SNS to participate in the review. In addition, we have asked
Geoff Gettelfinger and Jim Chrzanowski to serve on the review committee. |
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Chits and Disposition
Presentation -
Reiersen
Presentation - Brooks
Presentation - Cole
Presentation - Brown
Presentation - Viola
-Movie Files-
MCHP - Shell 1
MCHP - Shell 2
MCHP - Shell 3
Local Back Tracking
Review Committee Report
|
|
Review Board Report |
 |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
|
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
|
1 Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|
