Review
Title |
Base Support Structure PDR |
Date |
06 March 2008 |
Cognizant
Engineer |
Fred Dahlgren |
Responsible Line Manager |
Phil Heitzenroeder |
Review Board Chairperson |
Erik Perry |
Review Board Members |
Larry Dudek, Irv Zatz, Art
Brooks, Mike Cole, David Williamson, Doug Loesser |
Invitees |
Tom Brown, Judy Malsbury,
Jerry Levine, Jeff Makiel, Hutch Neilson, Jeff Harris, Steve
Raftopoulos, Paul Goranson |
Attendees |
Tom Brown, Phil
Heitzenroeder, Hutch Neilson, Jeff Makiel, Paul Goranson, Don Rej, Joe
Rushinski, H. M. Fan, Mike Coil, Steve Raftopoulos |
Charge |
The charge
to the review committee is as follows:
1) Has the Systems Requirement Document
been prepared? Are interfaces
adequately defined in it?
2) Does the design meet the
requirements?
3) Are the critical calculations
necessary to confirm the design basis
sound?
4) Have the constructability, assembly
and installation plans been
adequately addressed?
5) Have the drawings and models been
promoted to Preliminary Design
release level? |
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Chits and Disposition
Presentation
SRD
Drawing
|
Review Board Report |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
better define loads and cryostat
interface |
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
not discussed |
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
chit on coil fault loads not
resolved |
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
The requirements and
interfaces need to be more completely defined. Eight of the chits
generated at this review address issues with defining the requirements
more completely and then freezing the requirements. The results
for the analysis done so far were reviewed and it was decided to go to a
heavier beam for the columns (to account for yet to be defined loads)The
ability to implement this design was discussed and no issues were
identified other than that a build vs. buy decision would need to be
made later. Chits from the Peer Review were discussed and two have
been addressed. The third chit (on coil fault loads) has not yet
been resolved. |
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |