| Review
Title |
Field Period Assembly Plan
Peer Review |
| Date |
30 March 2004 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Mike Cole |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Larry Dudek |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
Brad Nelson |
|
Review Board Members |
Erik Perry, Dave Williamson,
Mike Viola, Tom Brown |
|
Invited Attendees |
Frank Jones, Paul
Goranson, Kevin Freudenberg |
|
Other Attendees |
|
|
Charge |
1. Are the field period
assembly plans consistent with the design of the vacuum vessel and
modular coils? 2.
Are the procurement plans for the modular coil winding forms and
vacuum vessel segment assemblies consistent with the field period
assembly schedule?
3. Are the tooling
options adequate for field period assembly operations?
4. Are the planned
mockup adequate for training and practice purposes? |
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Presentation
Chits and Project
Disposition
Critical Paths |
|
Review Board Report |
|
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
 |
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
N/A |
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
Not Preserved |
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
1.Field period assembly plans
are consistent with the design of the vacuum vessel and modular coils.
2.Are the procurement plans for
the modular coil windings forms and vacuum vessel segment assemblies
consistent with the field period assembly schedule?
3.Are the tooling options
adequate for field period assembly operations?
4.Are the planned
mockups adequate for training and practice purposes?
|
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
Acceptable |
|
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
Action required by Disposition is complete |
