| Review
Title |
Vacuum Vessel SOW Peer
Review |
| Date |
14 April 2004 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Mike Viola |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Wayne Reiersen |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
John Schmidt |
|
Review Board Members |
P. Heitzenroeder, F.
Malinowski, M. Cole, L. Dudek |
|
Invited Attendees |
|
|
Other Attendees |
|
|
Charge |
Is the VVSA SOW suitable
for the production contract? Of particular importance is the
degree of PPPL control over the supplier's process: Is the
entire MIT/QA plan PPPL-approved or just specified hold points and
inspections? Also, the extent and frequency of formal reporting
required.
|
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
VVSA SOW
Chits and Disposition |
|
Review Board Report |
 |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
 |
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
Review successful with resolution of CHITS
|
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1
Acceptable |
|
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
