| Review
Title |
C Type Upper and Lower Lead
Blocks FDR |
| Date |
03 June 2005 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Dave Williamson |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Brad Nelson |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
Wayne Reiersen |
|
Review Board Members |
Jim Chrzanowski, Larry
Dudek, Phil Heitzenroeder, Art Brooks |
|
Invitees |
Wayne Reiersen, Mike
Zarnstorff, Paul Fogarty, Kevin Freudenberg, Steve Raftopoulos,
Brent Stratton, Greg Pitonak, Jeff Makiel, Jim Chrzanowski, Larry Dudek,
Phil Heitzenroeder, Art Brooks, Hutch Neilson |
|
Attendees |
Brad Nelson, David
Williamson, Jim Chrzanowski, Larry Dudek, Hutch Neilson, Art Brooks,
Jeff Makiel, Wayne Reiersen, Bob Simmons, Paul Fogarty |
|
Charge |
1.
Does the lead block design
1.1 Provide a geometry into which the conductor can be
readily “wound”?
1.2 Fix the conductors in the lead region in a
repeatable pattern for each coil of the same type?
1.3 Support the conductor structurally?
1.4 Isolate the conductors from each other
electrically?
1.5 Maintain cooling continuity in the lead region?
1.6 Stay within the geometric envelope used for VV/mod
coil assembly?
1.7 Maintain acceptable field errors?
2. Have the drawings and models been reviewed and
are they ready for promotion to
fabrication level? |
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Report
Presentation |
|
Review Board Report |
 |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
 |
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
|
1 Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
1Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
