NCSX Web Pages  

Project | Management | Physics | Procurement | Manufacturing

NCSX FTP Sites  

Project FTP Server | Supplier FTP Server

Navigation Trail  

Engineering > Design Review > WBS 4
Review Title Electrical Power Systems CDR
Date 07 July 2005
Cognizant Engineer Raki Ramakrishnan
Responsible Line Manager Al vonHalle
Review Board Chairperson Charlie Neumeyer
Review Board Members Charlie Neumeyer, Mike Zarnstorff, Mounir Awad, Eugene Baker, Jerry Levine, Judy Malsbury
Invitees Al vonHalle, Charlie Neumeyer, Wayne Reiersen, Ron Strykowsky, Hutch Neilson, Mike Zarnstorff, John Lacenere, Brad Nelson, Bob Marsala, Dick Majeski, Bob Kaita, Mike Williams, Paul Sichta, Mark Cropper, John Dong, Ray Camp, David Williamson, Mike Kalish, Erik Perry, Mounir Awad, Eugene Baker, Jerry Levine, Judy Malsbury
Attendees Tony Langella, Rick Van Kirk, Jerry Levine, Rich Borusovic, Leif Dietrich, Charlie Neumeyer, Bob Marsala, Gene Baker, Mounir Awad, Judy Malsbury, Wayne Reiersen, Mike Kalish, Bob Kaita, Don McBride, John Lacenere, Bob Simmons, Art Wise, Paul Sichta, Raki Ramakrishnan,
Charge 1. Does the C-site option appear to be a reasonable and cost effective solution to meet the electrical power requirements (as documented in the GRD) for First Plasma?
2. Does the scope of the conceptual design (as documented in the SDD and schematics) appear complete?
3. Have attendant risks have been identified and addressed in the project plans?
4. Do the resources and schedule in the project baseline appear adequate for the design and implementation of the Electrical Power System (WBS 4)?
5. Has electrical safety has been sufficiently addressed in the design and implementation plans?
6. Is the project ready to proceed with preliminary design of the Electrical Power System (WBS4)?
Design Review Material



Design Description

CD4 with C-site Supplies

Budget Document

Chits and Disposition Plan

Power System Photo's

   Photo #1

   Photo #2

   Photo #3

Design Review Report

Review Board Report
Items Reviewed

Sat Unsat


Appropriate requirements identified    
Development plans and schedules  
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA    
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews    
Cost objectives    

Other review objectives addressed

(Attachment 4 of ENG-033)


Summary of Results


(check  one)

 1  Acceptable
 1 Acceptable pending resolution of concerns - CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation.
 1Incomplete - Additional design work is required prior to another design review.

Cog Engineer Close-out

(check  when done)

 1 Action required by Disposition is complete

Privacy and Security Notice

Please forward comments and questions to the Webmaster