| Review
Title |
Vacuum Vessel Systems (Part
1) FDR |
| Date |
16 September 2005 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Paul Goranson |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Wayne Reiersen |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
Brad Nelson |
|
Review Board Members |
Fred Dahlgren, Mike Viola,
Mike Kalish, Mike Cole, Geoff Gettelfinger, Larry Dudek |
|
Invitees |
Hutch Neilson, Phil
Heitzenroeder, Jim Chrzanowski, H.M. Fan, Kevin Freudenberg,
Mike Zarnstorff, Gregory Pitonak, Jeffrey Makiel, James Lyon, David E.
Williamson, Paul Fogarty, Martin Brown |
|
Attendees |
Wayne Reiersen, John Edward,
Bob Simmons, Hutch Neilson, Mike Kalish, Mike Zarnstorff, David Johnson,
Geoff Gettelfinger, Fred Dahlgren, Tom Brown, Brad Nelson, Mike Cole,
Dave Williamson, Kevin Freudenberg, Paul Goranson |
|
Charge |
Heating/cooling system
1. Is the heating/cooling design (including trace tubing,
manifolds, auxiliary heaters) adequate for temperature control of
the vacuum vessel during standby, normal operation, and bakeout?
2. Are the interfaces with the diagnostic magnetic loops defined?
3. Are the interfaces with the cryostat feasible?
4. Are the analyses complete and documented?
5. Is the heating load within the capacity of the envisioned helium
bakeout skid?
6. Are the design drawings and specifications adequate for
procurement?
VV lateral supports and
manned access ports
1. Is the design of the VV lateral support system adequate for
normal, fault, and handling loads, including upgraded first wall and
a full complement of diagnostics?
2. Do the supports have adequate capability and adjustment to
facilitate field period assembly and final assembly?
3. Is the manned access port adequate for initial operation and
maintenance?
4. Are the interfaces with other systems (primarily the mod coil
shell) adequately defined?
5. Are the analyses complete and documented?
6. Are the design drawings adequate for procurement?
Thermal insulation
1. Is the thermal insulation system adequate to protect the modular
coils and provide adequate insulation during standby, operation, and
bakeout?
2. Is the design compatible with the baseline insulation fill
material and with the known potential fill materials?
3. Are the part drawings ready for procurement?
Local I&C
1. Is the instrumentation proposed adequate for standby, operation,
and bakeout?
2. Are the thermocouples specified and ready for procurement?
3. Are the thermocouple locations specified? |
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Chits and Disposition Plan
Presentation
JPG folder
Drawings
Review Report
|
|
Review Board Report |
 |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
 |
|
Summary of Results
|
|
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
|
1 Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|
