NCSX Web Pages  

Project | Management | Physics | Procurement | Manufacturing

NCSX FTP Sites  

Project FTP Server | Supplier FTP Server

Navigation Trail  

Engineering > Design Review > WBS 3
Review Title Rogowski Coil FDR
Date 9 August 2007
Cognizant Engineer George Labik
Responsible Line Manager Larry Dudek
Review Board Chairperson Larry Dudek
Review Board Members Mike Viola, Mike Cole, Bob Marsala, Wayne Reiersen, Stefan Gerhardt, Brent Stratton, George Labik, Larry Dudek
Invitees Tom Brown, Larry Dudek, Stefan Gerhardt, Geoff Gettelfinger, Jon Menard, Wayne Reiersen, Brent Stratton, Mike Viola, Mike Zarnstorff, Jim Anderson, Mike Cole, Jerry Levine, Jeff Makiel, Judy Malsbury, Brad Nelson, Mike Williams
Attendees George Labik, Robert Marsala, Larry Dudek, Wayne Reiersen, Mike Cole, Mike Viola, Brent Stratton, Frank Malinowski, Stefan Gerhardt
Charge 1) Are the requirements well defined? Yes, listed in the FDR Presentation.

2) Does the design meet the requirements?  Yes, it does.

3) Is the design adequately underpinned by analysis, R&D, and past experience with similar design? Have the analyses been documented and checked?

A)  A prototype was constructed and subjected to response testing (data presented at the PDR), thermal cycling and trial fit up on VV3 with personnel who will be responsible for the installation present for discussion.

B)  The materials exceed the temperature requirement and measured at acceptable magnetic permeability.

4) Do drawings define the design adequately to be used as the basis for fabrication, acceptance, and installation?  Drawings are complete except for an installation drawing and will be formatted per PPPL standards and obtain a release for fabrication stamp after the FDR is declared a success.

5) Can the coils be fabricated and installed within the budget and schedule identified in the project baseline? Yes, they can. based upon the revised baseline and the prototype experience and the degree to which the work station is completed.

 6) Have all relevant chits from previous design reviews been adequately addressed? Yes, they are part of the FDR presentation material.

 7) Have all significant technical, cost, schedule, and safety risks been identified and addressed? Yes

Design Review Material


Chits and Disposition

Chit Responses

Presentation VV Shell

Presentation Option

Thermal Cycle Tests


Review Board Report
Items Reviewed

Sat Unsat


Appropriate requirements identified    
Development plans and schedules  
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA    
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews    
Cost objectives    

Other review objectives addressed

(Attachment 4 of ENG-033)


Summary of Results


(check  one)

  1 Acceptable
  Acceptable pending resolution of concerns - CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation.
  1 Incomplete - Additional design work is required prior to another design review.

Cog Engineer Close-out

(check  when done)

 1 Action required by Disposition is complete

Privacy and Security Notice

Please forward comments and questions to the Webmaster