| Review
Title |
PF Coil PDR |
| Date |
14 December 2007 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Mike Kalish |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Phil Heitzenroeder |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
Charles Neumeyer |
|
Review Board Members |
Phil Heitzenroeder, Charles
Neumeyer, Mike Bird (NHMFL), Jim Chrzanowski, Larry Dudek |
|
Invitees |
Jeff Makiel, Jerry Levine,
Judy Malsbury, Jim Anderson, Don Rej, Hutch Neilson, Raki Ramakrishnan,
Tom Brown, Fred Dahlgren, Mike Cole, W. Ted Hunter |
|
Attendees |
Mike Cole, Chuck Swenson,
Jim Chrzanowski, Raki Ramakrishnan, Charlie Neumeyer, Phil
Heitzenroeder, Judy Malsbury, Bob Simmons, Tom Meighan, Steve
Raftopoulos , Hutch Neilson, Ron Strykowsky, Jim Anderson, Frank
Malinowski, Art Brooks, Larry Sutton, Joe Rushinski, Fred Dahlgren |
|
Charge |
The committee is to evaluate the
degree of success of the review with regards to the following requirements
as required by PPPL Engineering Procedure ENG-033, Rev. 2:
- Verify that all
requirements are being addressed. Identify requirement or design
conflict and potential "show stoppers"
- Review the result of
analyses, calculations, and tests conducted to obtain additional
information for the design
- Review w the ability to
implement the proposed design taking into consideration capabilities,
tolerances, costs, quality reliability and ES& H security
- Review test requirements
and plans
- Review updated design
and development plans and schedules
- Assure the appropriate
incorporation of recommendations from previous design reviews
- Review manufacturability
|
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Chits and Disposition
Presentation
|
|
Review Board Report |
 |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
X |
|
Need to document V&I
requirements (chit #2) |
|
Development plans and schedules |
X |
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
14 Chits submitted. Most were associated
with bolts, & bolt criteria, and checking. A chit suggesting
upgrading the bolts from grade 5 to grade 8 was accepted. The
calculations allowable, and calculation checking will all be included in
this change. |
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
|
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|
