| Review
Title |
NCSX LN2 Distribution System
PDR |
| Date |
05 June 2008 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Paul Goranson |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Phil Heitzenroeder |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
Bill Blanchard |
|
Review Board Members |
Larry Dudek, Kurt Rempetz,
Steve Raftopoulos, Arkadly Klebaner, David Gwinn, Kuo-Chen Wu |
|
Invitees |
Steve Raftopoulos, Paul
Goranson, Larry Dudek, David Gwinn, Arkadly Klebaner, Kuo-Chen Wu, Tom
Peterson, Hutch Neilson, Don Rej, Bob Simmons, Jeff Harris, Jeff Makiel,
Pat Kelly, Judy Malsbury, Jerry Levine, Mike Williams, Mike Viola, Mike
Gouge, Mike Cole, Brad Neilson, Sorin Homescu, Kevin Freudenberg, Fred
Dahlgren, Bill Blanchard |
|
Attendees |
Larry Dudek, Kurt Rempetz,
Steve Raftopoulos, Arkadly Klebaner, David Gwinn, Kuo-Chen Wu, Paul
Goranson, Bill Blanchard, Phil Heitzenroeder, Mike Cole, Mike Kalish,
Hutch Neilson, Jeff Makiel, Jerry Levine, Don Rej |
|
Charge |
1. A
current Work Planning form must be on file. WP#_(pending). (Waived because
NCSX is in phase-out mode).
2. A Systems Requirement (SRD): It
need not be approved at the time of the review, but should have been widely
reviewed such that closure and approval can be accomplished immediately
following the review.
3. Models & Drawings: Drawings must
adequately convey the design concept and be consistent with the supporting
analyses. Need not be approved at the time of the review, but should have
been widely reviewed such that closure and approval can be accomplished
immediately following the review
4. Technical Requirements & Analyses:
Requirements must be clearly defined. Analyses demonstrating that the design
meets the requirements must be documented in an auditable form (not view
graph presentations), and, at a minimum, must be reviewed by the RLM.
Analysis supporting the PDR should have been reviewed and be ready for final
checking and approval following the review.
5. Interfaces defined: Major system to
system interfaces should be identified and reviewed as part of the design
review. Status of agreements on key interfaces should be defined in the SRD
and presented during the PDR.
6. Failure Modes and Effects Analyses
If specified in the Work Planning Form,. a draft FMECA should have been
circulated and commented upon prior to the review. Refer to Procedure
ENG-008, available at:
http://www.pppl.gov/eshis/procedures.html#ENG
. (Waived – see 1.)
7. Resolution of Previous Design
Review Comments / Chits: all prior comments/CHITS from previous reviews
(Peer/CDR) should be addressed and the proposed resolution(s) agreed upon as
part of the design review conclusions.
8. Manufacturability /
Constructability: The planned manufacturing and construction approaches must
be compatible with design requirements and be practical and cost effective.
An overview and results from supporting studies, vendor contacts, etc. are
to be presented in the review. |
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Chits and Disposition
Presentation
B-Specification
Summary
|
|
Review Board Report |
|
|
Items Reviewed |
 |
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
Please see link under Design
Review Material |
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
|
1
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|
