From: Neil Pomphrey
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 12:05 PM
To: Thomas G. Brown; Michael J. Duco; George W. Labik
Cc: Michael E. Viola
Subject: RE: Inner theta loop points

Yes

The concern is with the TH*180-3 and TH*0-3 loops. They must have the mirror symmetry we discussed earlier. Small changes in the other loops such as TH*180-5 should be acceptable.

Neil

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas G. Brown 
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:36 AM
To: Michael J. Duco; Neil Pomphrey; George W. Labik
Cc: Michael E. Viola
Subject: RE: Inner theta loop points

Mike - the process should be okay as it would be no different that if I generated the points for you.  One thing to keep in mind is that I thought that loop THA180-5 had an edge that came too close to the vessel flange.  I expect that you will need to modify your new loop somewhat to eliminate the flange interference.  The rule is that as long as the loops are identical and symmetrical about the CS0 X-axis making a slight change in the geometry that Neil Pomphrey supplied originally should be okay.  Neil and George, please confirm this assessment. 

Tom   

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael J. Duco 
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:24 AM
To: Thomas G. Brown
Subject: Inner theta loop points

Tom,
I was able to generate points (36 each) along the original inner theta loop spline's we were given. If this is an acceptable method of reforming the loops please let me know. 

Mike Duco


Michael J. Duco
Neutral Beam Cryogenics
Princeton University, Plasma Physics Lab
Forrestal Campus,Route 1 North at Sayre Dr.
P. O. Box 451
Princeton, N. J. 08543
mduco@pppl.gov 
(609)243-3787
(609)243-3373