From: Michael E. Viola
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006
2:03 PM
To: Arthur W. Brooks; Bob Simmons; Bradley E. Nelson; Edward
G. Bush; Hutch Neilson; John W. Edwards; Lawrence E. Dudek; Michael C.
Zarnstorff; Michael J. Duco; Mike Cole; Paul L. Goranson; Ronald L. Strykowsky;
Steve Raftopoulos; Thomas G. Brown; Wayne T. Reiersen; Engineering Conference
Room; Phil Heitzenroeder
Subject: coil alignment test
We performed the
coil alignment test yesterday afternoon.
First we had
difficulty getting the laser tracker to become stable. it was during
approximately 0.005 in. It appears that the portable transformer power
supply that was being used induced some noise into the system. Once
we plugged into house power the noise reduced to approximately
0.0005in.
Then we installed
1/2in. thick pieces of G-10 at three locations. C-1 coil was on the
bottom and C-3 was on the top. When we loaded the C-3 coil onto the C-1
coil we noticed that the C-1 deflected 0.068in. downward and to the
right. This was in the direction of the 20° taper of the base. Then we unloaded
the coil and noticed that it came back to a reading of 0.025in. We then
reloaded the coil and founded that it returned to the 0.068in. position. We then
at the end of the test we measured the bottom of the planned of the fixture of
the 20° fixture and learned that the back end of the fixture (thicker) flexed
about 0.040in. on the floor and up the front edge of the fixture deflected
about 0.013in. on the floor. In other words the NCSX floor has a
significant amount of spring in the floor substrate.
The
procedure we used was once we've identified as we decided that we must take our
readings at the fully loaded position. So employing a scale in the load
line we ensured that the coil was fully loaded for our measurements.
Four plates were use one each leg, in order to provide lateral and rotational
translation of the C-3 coil on top.
once we understood
that the problems within the system, we also learned that there were hard
interferences between C-1 and C-3 coil which provided very little wiggle room
for us to perform the test without interference. One of the clamps number 71 on
the C-1 coil comes in extremely close proximity to the corresponding clamp on
the C-3 coil. Additionally, the wing by the key comes in contact with
the G-10 and steel spacer poloidal break. Therefore in ordered to perform a
test, we physically offset the coil slightly in order to provide about a
sixteenth of an inch wiggle room between the two coils so that the test could be
performed uninhibited.
Lowered the upper
C-3 coil fully on the G-10 blocks located in three places around coil.
Metrology measurements were taken which located both the bottom coil and
also the top coil. As shown in the attached picture. Then the top
coil was lifted off allowed to float and the G-10 pieces were replaced with
two 1/4in. G-10 pieces and nominal piece of shim
gages.
The coil was fully
loaded and z direction numbers taken. we were about +/- 0.030 - 0.050" off
We lifted the coil
and adjusted the metal shim pack.
Lowered the coil and
took another set of measurements, We were within a few
thousands.
Repeated the process
and arrived at Z less than 0.001" within 25 minutes.
Then we looked at
the X-Y and rotational measurements. We were off about
0.180"
We adjusted the
screws by eye and got down to about 0.075 noted that the z position remained
unchanged.
Repeated the process
a few times and got down to with in 0.020" noted that the z position changed
about 0.030" due to a shift of the bottom coil on the wedge since it was only
bolted in two places.
Stopped there since
we were dealing with the sponginess of the floor and the poor bolting of the
coil to wedge.
We also decided that
a set of dial indicators would greatly assist the positioning.
The test was
unanimously deemed a success.
Thanks,
Mike
Viola, PPPL, (609) 243 3655