• EIO will deliver remaining MCWFs at rate of one every 4 weeks, the last on 4/17/07. All MCWFs needed for first field period are delivered by the 11th delivery, second field period by the 13th delivery.
• Payment of additional consideration is tied to on-schedule delivery of winding forms, and especially completion of field period sets.
• Amount of additional consideration is under negotiation.
  

• Field period assembly operations have been compressed by completing #1 and #2 in parallel, #3 on two shifts. Costs (other than additional MCWF consideration) are a wash.
  

• Feb. 15.  Briefing for OFES. (Update on MCWF and Project schedule re-planning).  Need slides on 1) How far off the ECP-039 plan are we? 2) When do the new and old plans come back together? And 3) How are we making up for the delay, in detail.  Action: Ron by Tuesday 2/14.
• Feb. 17.  SC Watch List briefing. (Pitonak & Makiel presenting to Decker and Davies)  Message: the project can be completed within the approved performance baseline.
• Feb. 22.   FY-06 1Q Quarterly.  Outlook for the next 3-months, i.e., where we expect to be at the time of the May 9-10 Lehman Review.
  

• Team from CH will visit PPPL and will focus on NCSX.
• Interactions will include presentations by NCSX, interviews with project staff, examination of project documents.
• Dry runs will be week of Feb. 27
• Wayne will issue guidance and dry run plan.
  

Type A cladding and chill plate drawings have slipped. They are expected to be done this week.

Type lead blocks will be done this week.

Diversion of effort to address MCWF vendor issues has contributed to delays in other MC design activities. This may result in a significant schedule variance in January.

First Type A MCWF is expected May 16.  There is a risk that delivery of small parts will hold-up Type A coil winding as a result of drawing delays. It may be necessary to expedite parts orders. Larry.

Type C assembly drawings are nearly finished. It should be possible to expedite the Type B & C assembly drawings by adding staff.

• A detailed report of actuals vs. estimates will be needed for the Lehman review.  Will we need to request additional contingency?
• For the quarterly, we can report cost and schedule for C1 and part of C2.  We need to reduce the number of unaccounted for hours. Action: Larry develop 1-2 slides for the Feb. 22 quarterly, explaining actuals vs. estimates, with <10% of the charged hours unaccounted for.