From: Hutch Neilson
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 10:19
PM
To: Bradley E. Nelson; Hutch Neilson; Jim Lyon; Lawrence E. Dudek;
Mike Williams; Michael C. Zarnstorff; Phil Heitzenroeder; Wayne T. Reiersen;
Ronald L. Strykowsky; Mike Cole
Subject: Summary of NCSX SIT Meeting
of 5/22/06
Summary of NCSX
System Integration Team (SIT) Meeting of Monday, May 22,
2006
1. Management items
- Budget for the rest of
FY-06 is very tight. Plans have been scaled back to keep from over-spending.
We reviewed the plans and priorities. We need to re-visit whether planned
transfer of $175k from PPPL to ORNL is still optimum. Action: Jim
assess impact if transfer amount were $100k instead of $175. By 5/30.
- A number of potential
spending needs, which are currently unbudgeted, are under discussion. The
following were discussed by the SIT:
- Magnetic alignment: A
method for aligning coils based on inductances has been proposed. Its
purpose is to mitigate technical risk associated with the limitations of
mechanical alignment methods. The cost of developing the technique and
building the equipment has been estimated to be at least $100k (ROM).
Between now and June 30, continue analyses of issues and develop a more
accurate cost estimate. (Mike Z.) Decide on further
expenditures around the end of June.
- Additional coil winding
fixtures: Discussed at a separate meeting on 5/22. Winding
operations are currently staff-limited, but additional fixtures (and
associated staff increases) may be needed to meet the coil winding schedule.
Options range from a holding fixture ($15k) to a full coil winding
station ($70k). Fixture preparation would need to start in FY-06 to be ready
in early FY-07, in time to make a meaningful impact on the schedule.
However, no FY-06 funds have yet been identified. (Hutch, Ron)
- Cold testing beyond C1:
The baseline is to only cold test C1, but there are arguments and
review recommendations to increase the scope of testing. We will re-visit
these after C1 is tested. (Hutch)
- Trim coils: The
amount budgeted for trim coils can provide a basic two-coil system just
outside the PF coils, but that may not be the optimum location. It may be
preferable to mount them on the modular coil shell (~1,000 A-turns), but
they would be trapped once the machine is assembled. Therefore, it might be
necessary to install a full system while the machine is being assembled, but
there is no budget for it in the MIE project. (Hutch, Wayne, Mike Z.)
- Coil resistance
measurement. It was proposed that we should re-instate the provisions
to make coil resistance measurements prior to a shot. It has been proposed
to eliminate this as one of several scope cuts. However, a resistence
measureement is critical to verify that the coil has cooled back down since
the previous pulse. Resolutlion: do at least the minimum to ensure
we have this capability. (Wayne)
- Safety:
- Tour safety in
manufacturing facility needs to be addressed. Provide information and
training for tour guides. Restrict tour hours. Clearly demarcate tour routes
and stay-out zones. Action: Hutch work with Dudek, DeLooper et al.
- PPPL safety forum
stressed link between mistakes/lapses and accidents. Since mistakes
can’t be eliminated, have to work to make the system robust against isolated
lapses and mistakes.
- Diagnostic organization:
Brent Stratton succeeds Dave Johnson as WBS 3 manager. Larry Dudek is
the RLM.
- April cost performance
report. Cost and schedule variances have grown, mostly attributed to the same
jobs as for the past several months. WBS 14 design has shown some improvement.
WBS 3 variances are getting worse. Action: Hutch follow up with
Brent.
2. Risks
- C1 cold testing schedule.
Progress in last few days has kept apace of schedule. Strain gage
test results are consistent with expectations. Kevin Freudenberg is delivering
a new displacement monitor for installation on the test coil. (Wayne)
- C3 and C4 schedule risks.
C3 is due to finish pre-VPI ops. June 6, but is forecast to be several
days (≤l week) late. C4 is due July 20, but is losing some shifts this week
while C2 is being potted. Action: Larry try to recover schedule if possible
- Modular coil shear plate
tests. All of the hardware has been fabricated. We are awaiting the studs so
they can be installed to simulate what would be done during coil assembly at
PPPL. The studs should be in very soon.
(M. Cole)
4. Next SIT Meeting: June 5,
2006
Summary by:
Hutch Neilson