From: Hutch Neilson [hneilson@pppl.gov]
Sent: Friday, 
April 02, 2004 4:43 PM
To: Wayne T. Reiersen
Subject: FW: 
Vacuum Vessel Peer Review, Thursday 4/8 at 9:30
Wayne, This 
got scheduled for Thursday (in the former C-site power supply time slot) because 
of the Good Friday holiday next week.  I will be away on travel that day, 
but so be it. John has agreed to chair the review. Hutch
------ Forwarded Message
From: Hutch 
  Neilson <hneilson@pppl.gov>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 16:32:07 
  -0500
To: Mike Viola <mviola@pppl.gov>, Paul Goranson 
  <goransonpl@y12.doe.gov>, Brad Nelson <nelsonbe@ornl.gov>, Wayne 
  Reiersen <wreiersen@pppl.gov>, Phil Heitzenroeder 
  <pheitzen@pppl.gov>, John Schmidt <jschmidt@pppl.gov>, Frank 
  Malinowski <fmalinowski@pppl.gov>, Mike Cole <colemj@ornl.gov>, 
  Larry Sutton <lsutton@pppl.gov>
Cc: Pamela Hampton 
  <phampton@pppl.gov>, Marianne Tyrrell 
  <mtyrrell@pppl.gov>
Subject: Vacuum Vessel Peer Review, 
  Thursday 4/8 at 9:30
There will be a peer review of three Vacuum 
  Vessel product-related documents next Thursday, April 8, at 9:30.  It 
  will probably last about 2 hours.
PPPL participants will meet in the 
  Engineering Conference Room and will call the ORNL conference room at 
  865-241-1255.  Presentation material will be shared via NetMeeting. 
   Unless otherwise instructed.
The three documents being reviewed 
  are:
  
    - VVSA statement of work (SOW) 
    
- VVSA product specification, including drawings and 
    models 
    
- PVVS evaluation plan
 
Chair: John Schmidt
RLM:  Wayne Reiersen
Cog (for 
  SOW): Mike Viola
Cog (for Spec and PVVS Plan):  Paul 
  Goranson
Reviewers:  Phil Heitzenroeder, Frank Malinowski, Mike 
  Cole, Larry Dudek
Charge
  
    - Is the VVSA SOW suitable for the production contract? 
    Of particular importance is the degree of PPPL control over the supplier’s 
    process: Is the entire MIT/QA plan PPPL-approved or just specified hold 
    points and inspections?  Also, the extent and frequency of formal 
    reporting required.
 
  
    - Is the product spec consistent with the design-to 
    requirements?
 
  
    - Does the product spec provide an adequate technical 
    basis for manufacture?
 
Hutch
------ End of 
Forwarded Message