From: Bob Simmons [bsimmons@pppl.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Reiersen_Wayne
Subject: Comments on Draft F of GRD

Hi Wayne,

Hope you got your daughter settled in Michigan.

Here are some more generic comments on the GRD:

(1) Cover page - I would recommend that there is only one preparer (in this
case you for GRD), Mike (and others as appropriate) will be a concurrence
signature (a review signature doesn't tell me anything), and only one
approver (in this case Hutch).  We should follow this scheme for all of our
plans and documents.
(2) Does the GRD address any requirements during the fabrication project or
just the finished product?  I think it is the latter, but perhaps I am
missing something here.
(3) Record of Revisions - might be nice to show what the major changes is
Rev E and F were.
(4) Section 2.3 - minor grammatical correction => put comma before "where
wbs #..."
(5) Section 2.3 - do we want to add CMP or address how these changes to
these requirements will be handled?  No need to go into much detail, but
merely mention that changes handled via CMP.
(6) Section 3.1.1 - is this mission consistent to what we said in the PEP?
(7) Sectiojn 3.1.2 - PEP Annex I specifies specific definition of the
Fabrication Project -- perhaps you may want to reference that.  YOu really
don't specify the fab project scope here.

Bob S.

Bob Simmons
NCSX Systems Engineering Support Manager
Engineering Wing Room 120 (MS-08)
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
U.S. Route 1 North, Receiving 3
Princeton, New Jersey 08543
Telephone: (609) 243-2766
Fax: (609) 243-3030