Review
Title |
TF Coil Design Peer Review |
Date |
15 September 2004 |
Cognizant
Engineer |
Mike Kalish |
Responsible Line Manager |
Wayne Reiersen |
Review Board Chairperson |
Brad Nelson |
Review Board Members |
Phil Heitzenroeder, Tom
Brown, Dave Williamson, Mike Viola, Jim Chrzanowski |
Invited Attendees |
Hutch Neilson, Mike
Zarnstorff, Bob Simmons, Art Brooks, Mike Cole, Larry Dudek, Len
Myatt, HM Fan, Joe Rushinski,
Judy Malsbury |
Attendees |
Hutch Neilson, Art Brooks,
Steve Raftopoulos, Geoff Gettelfinger, Phil Heitzenroeder, HM Fan, Larry
Dudek, Tom Brown, Brad Nelson, Judy Malsbury, Mike Viola, Wayne Reiersen |
Charge |
1. Are the two design
options well enough understood to make a decision between them?
a.
Design models/drawings/integration with rest of core
b.
Design analysis, including fault conditions
c.
Assembly into field periods and final assembly
d.
Cost estimate
e.
Schedule estimate
f.
Risk assessment
2. Does the review
committee concur with he recommendation of the WBS 13 manager?
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
TF Coil Presentation
Chits and Disposition Plan |
Review Board Report |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
The Board
concurs with the recommendation of the cog. engineer (Mike Kalish) to
pursue the alternate design. Critical issues identified in the chits
should be resolved before the November PDR.
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
Acceptable |
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
Action required by Disposition is complete |