| Review
Title |
TF Coil System PDR |
| Date |
07 February 2005 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Mike Kalish |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Brad Nelson |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
Wayne Reiersen |
|
Review Board Members |
Art Brooks, Dave Williamson,
Mike Cole, Jim Chrzanowski, Tom Brown, Fred Dahlgren, Charlie Neumeyer,
Larry Dudek, Phil Heitzenroeder |
|
Invitees |
H. M. Fan, Hutch Neilson, Mike
Zarnstorff, Judy Malsbury, Jerry Levine, Brent Stratton, Geoff Gettelfinger,
Raki Ramakrishnan, Mike Williams, Mike Viola, Steve Raftopoulos, Len Myatt |
|
Attendees |
Charlie Neumeyer, Hutch
Neilson, Wayne Reiersen, Jim Chrzanowski, Raki Ramakrishnan, Art Brooks,
Phil Heitzenroeder, Geoff Gettelfinger, Mike Zarnstorff, Brent Stratton,
H.M. Fan, Larry Dudek, Judy Malsbury, Jerry Levine, Jeff Makiel, Joe
Rushinski, Mike Viola, Mike Williams, Frank Malinowski |
|
Charge |
-
Requirements.
Do the requirements provide an adequate basis for proceeding with
final design?
-
Design.
Does the design address and meet the requirements?
-
Analysis.
Does the analysis indicate the design satisfies the design criteria
and is robust in regard to engineering uncertainties?
-
R&D.
Is additional R&D warranted to reduce engineering uncertainties?
-
Manufacturability.
Can the design be readily manufactured?
-
Design Integration
-
Is the design
compatible with the integrated model of the stellarator core?
-
Is the design
consistent with project plans and requirements for field period
and machine assembly?
-
Do adequate
clearances exist for field period assembly, final assembly, and
operation?
-
Interfaces.
Have the physical and functional interfaces been adequately
established to proceed with final design?
-
Procurement.
Is the procurement plan (e.g., make versus buy, bundling of
procurements) appropriate?
-
Cost and Schedule. Are the cost and schedule baselines (and
cost basis documentation) consistent with the technical baseline and
procurement plan? Do the cost and schedule baselines appear
reasonable?
-
ES&H.
Have potential environmental, health, and safety issues been
identified and addressed?
-
Risk management.
Have technical, cost, and schedule risks been identified and
appropriately mitigated?
-
Chits.
Have all chits from previous design reviews been adequately
addressed?
|
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
TF (SRD) System Required Document
TF Design Description
Analysis Reports
Presentation
TF Coil Rotation
Animation
TF PDR Review Board
Report
Chits and Disposition Plan |
|
Review Board Report |
 |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
|
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
|
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
1
Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|
