NCSX Web Pages  

Project | Management | Physics | Procurement | Manufacturing

NCSX FTP Sites  

Project FTP Server | Supplier FTP Server

Navigation Trail  

Engineering > Design Review > WBS 124 & 125
Review Title VV Cooling Tube FDR
Date 05 May  2005
Cognizant Engineer Paul Goranson
Responsible Line Manager Brad Nelson
Review Board Chairperson Wayne Reiersen
Review Board Members Fred Dahlgren, Mike Viola, Mike Kalish, Mike Cole, Geoff Gettelfinger, Larry Dudek
Invitees Hutch Neilson, Phil Heitzenroeder, Jim Chrzanowski, HM Fan, Kevin Freudenberg, Mike Zarnstorff, Bob Simmons, Brent Stratton
Attendees Wayne Reiersen, Hutch Neilson, Brad Nelson, Fred Dahlgren, Brent Stratton, Mike Cole, Kevin Freudenberg, Mike Kalish, Mike Zarnstorff, Geoff Gettelfinger, Larry Dudek
Charge Heating/cooling tube system

1. Is the heating/cooling design (including trace tubing, manifolds, auxiliary heaters, and thermocouples) adequate for temperature control of the vacuum vessel during standby, normal operation, and bakeout?
2. Are the interfaces with the diagnostic magnetic loops defined?
3. Are the interfaces with the cryostat feasible?
4. Are the analyses complete and documented?
5. Is the heating load within the capacity of the envisioned helium bakeout skid?
6. Are the design drawings and specifications adequate for procurement?

VV supports

1. Is the design of the VV support system adequate for normal, fault, and handling loads, including upgraded first wall and a full complement of diagnostics?
2. Do the supports have adequate capability and adjustment to facilitate field period assembly and final assembly?
3. Are the interfaces with other systems (primarily the mod coil shell) adequately defined?
4. Are the analyses complete and documented?
5. Are the design drawings adequate for procurement?

 
Design Review Material

Announcement

Presentation

Design Review Report

Drawings

Specification

Chits and Disposition Plan

Review Board Report
Items Reviewed

Sat Unsat

Comments

Appropriate requirements identified    
Development plans and schedules  
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA    
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews    
Cost objectives    

Other review objectives addressed

(Attachment 4 of ENG-033)

   

Summary of Results

Disposition

(check  one)

 1  Acceptable
  Acceptable pending resolution of concerns - CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation.
 1Incomplete - Additional design work is required prior to another design review.

Cog Engineer Close-out

(check  when done)

 
 1 Action required by Disposition is complete

Privacy and Security Notice

Please forward comments and questions to the Webmaster