| Review
          Title | VV Cooling Tube FDR | 
      
        | Date | 05 May  2005 | 
      
        | Cognizant
          Engineer | Paul Goranson | 
      
        | Responsible Line Manager | Brad Nelson | 
      
        | Review Board Chairperson | Wayne Reiersen | 
      
        | Review Board Members | Fred Dahlgren, Mike Viola, 
		Mike Kalish, Mike Cole, Geoff Gettelfinger, Larry Dudek | 
      
        | Invitees | Hutch Neilson, Phil 
	Heitzenroeder, Jim Chrzanowski, HM Fan, Kevin Freudenberg, Mike Zarnstorff, 
	Bob Simmons, Brent Stratton | 
      
        | Attendees | Wayne Reiersen, Hutch 
		Neilson, Brad Nelson, Fred Dahlgren, Brent Stratton, Mike Cole, Kevin 
		Freudenberg, Mike Kalish, Mike Zarnstorff, Geoff Gettelfinger, Larry Dudek | 
      
        | Charge | Heating/cooling tube 
			system 
 1. Is the heating/cooling design (including trace tubing, manifolds, 
			auxiliary heaters, and thermocouples) adequate for temperature 
			control of the vacuum vessel during standby, normal operation, and 
			bakeout?
 2. Are the interfaces with the diagnostic magnetic loops defined?
 3. Are the interfaces with the cryostat feasible?
 4. Are the analyses complete and documented?
 5. Is the heating load within the capacity of the envisioned helium 
			bakeout skid?
 6. Are the design drawings and specifications adequate for 
			procurement?
 
 VV supports
 
 1. Is the design of the VV support system adequate for normal, 
			fault, and handling loads, including upgraded first wall and a full 
			complement of diagnostics?
 2. Do the supports have adequate capability and adjustment to 
			facilitate field period assembly and final assembly?
 3. Are the interfaces with other systems (primarily the mod coil 
			shell) adequately defined?
 4. Are the analyses complete and documented?
 5. Are the design drawings adequate for procurement?
 
 | 
      
        | Design Review Material | 
        
        Announcement 
        
		Presentation 
        
		Design Review Report 
        Drawings 
        
		Specification  
        
		Chits and Disposition Plan | 
      
        | Review Board Report |  | 
      
        | Items Reviewed | 
    
     | Sat | Unsat | Comments | 
      
        | Appropriate requirements identified |  |   |  | 
      
        | Development plans and schedules |  |   |  | 
      
        | Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |  |   |  | 
      
        | Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |  |   |  | 
      
        | Cost 
          objectives |  |   |  | 
      
        | 
          Other 
          review objectives addressed 
          
          (Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |  |   |  | 
      
        | 
          Summary of Results |  | 
      
        | 
          Disposition 
          (check 
     one) | 1  Acceptable | 
      
        |  Acceptable pending resolution of concerns - 
    CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. | 
      
        | 1Incomplete -
    Additional design 
    work is required prior to another design review. | 
      
        | 
          Cog Engineer Close-out 
          (check 
     when done) |  | 
      
        | 1  
    Action required by Disposition is complete |