| Review
Title |
Rigging Trials Peer Review |
| Date |
12 August 2005 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Tom Brown |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Brad Nelson |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
Larry Dudek |
|
Review Board Members |
Mike Cole, Mike Viola, Art
Brooks, Jim Chrzanowski, Steve Raftopoulos |
|
Invitees |
Wayne Reiersen, Hutch Neilson,
Erik Perry, Larry Dudek, Jerry Levine , Fred Dahlgren, Jim Chrzanowski, Mike
Cole, Brad Nelson, David Williamson, Paul Goranson, Mike Viola, Art Brooks,
Steve Raftopoulos, Ron Strykowsky, Frank Malinowski, Judy Malsbury, Greg
Pitonak, Jeff Makiel, |
|
Attendees |
Larry Dudek, Hutch Neilson,
Art Brooks, Bill Slavin, Judy Malsbury Mike Viola, Wayne Reiersen, Steve
Raftopoulos, Jim Chrzanowski, Mike Zarnstorff, Phil Heitzenroeder, Mike
Cole, Jim Lyons |
|
Charge |
1. Does the block test
simulation adequately predict the ability to successfully move the
MC over the VV within the installation tolerances?
2. Can the laser screens
be fabricated and adequately located within some specified
tolerances to properly define the path of motion? Is there a better
approach?
3. If the MC is moved
in some manner that places it off the required path, is there a
method to find where it is, then retract and reposition it to be on
the correct path?
4. Technicians are
required to stabilize the MC (in close proximity to it) while it is
supported by the crane. Are there any safety issues that need
to be addressed prior to making this decision?
5. Is there
additional work or documentation that should be done prior to making
this decision? |
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Chits and Disposition Plan
Presentation
Summary of
Results
|
|
Review Board Report |
 |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
 |
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
 |
|
Summary of Results
|
|
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
Acceptable |
|
1
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
1Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|
