Review
Title |
Cladding Peer Review |
Date |
10 November 2005 |
Cognizant
Engineer |
Jim Chrzanowski |
Responsible Line Manager |
Larry Dudek |
Review Board Chairperson |
Wayne Reiersen |
Review Board Members |
Wayne Reiersen, Tom Meighan,
Jim Lyon, Dave Williamson, Brad Nelson, Brent Stratton, Hutch Neilson,
Larry Dudek, Phil Heitzenroeder, Jim Chrzanowski, Mike Anderson, Art
Brooks, Judy Malsbury |
Invitees |
Wayne Reiersen, Tom Meighan,
Jim Lyon, Dave Williamson, Brad Nelson, Brent Stratton, Hutch Neilson,
Larry Dudek, Phil Heitzenroeder, Jim Chrzanowski, Mike Anderson, Art
Brooks, Judy Malsbury |
Attendees |
Wayne Reiersen, Tom Meighan,
Jim Lyon, Dave Williamson, Brad Nelson, Brent Stratton, Hutch Neilson,
Larry Dudek, Phil Heitzenroeder, Jim Chrzanowski, Mike Anderson, Art
Brooks, Judy Malsbury |
Charge |
“Can we proceed with the
original plan, i.e. to set the clamp locations based on the measured
surface of the winding form, with acceptably low risk.” |
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Cladding Issues (Fogarty)
Review Board Report
|
Review Board Report |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
Appropriate requirements identified
|
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
1 Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|