Review
Title |
Modular Coil Inboard
Interface CC PDR |
Date |
7 August 2007 |
Cognizant
Engineer |
Dave Williamson |
Responsible Line Manager |
Brad Nelson |
Review Board Chairperson |
Phil Heitzenroeder |
Review Board Members |
Wayne Reiersen, Larry Dudek,
Stephen Langish, Mike Cole, HM Fan, Art Brooks, Mike Viola |
Invitees |
Geoff Gettelfinger, Stephen
Langish, Steve Raftopoulos, Phil Heitzenroeder, Paul Goranson, Larry
Dudek, Tom Brown, Art Brooks, H.M. Fan, Paul Fogarty, Kevin Freudenberg,
Tom Meighan, Dave Williamson, Wayne Reiersen, Mike Viola, Brad Nelson, Hutch
Neilson, Ron Strykowsky, Jim Lyons, Mike Williams, Jim Anderson, Mike
Zarnstorff, Judy Malsbury, Jerry Levine, Jeff Makiel, Greg Pitonak |
Attendees |
Phil Heitzenroeder, G.
McGinnis, Dave Williamson, Stephen Langish, Wayne Reiersen, Mike Cole,
Paul Fogarty, Kevin Freudenberg, Paul Goranson, Frank Malinowski, Brad
Nelson, Robert Parsells, Larry Dudek, Jeff Makiel, Mike Viola |
Charge |
1) Are the requirements
defined? What is the proposed design?
2) What are the results of access studies
to-date?
3) Is the analysis consistent with the
proposed design?
4) What is the plan to complete final
design?
5) Have prior design review chits been
addressed?
6) Are any coil modifications (extra
holes) ready to be approved?
7) Have all technical, cost/schedule,
and safety risks been addressed? |
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Chits and
Disposition
Presentation
|
Review Board Report |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
Appropriate requirements identified
|
X |
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
X
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
(Not applicable to this review) |
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
X |
|
|
Cost
objectives |
X |
|
Refer to Chit 2 |
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
X |
|
|
Summary of Results
|
The
committee judged the review to be successful. However, the committee
spent quite some time discussing the number bolts in the C-C
connection. It was finally concluded that we should continue with the
current plan to add six bolts and shims top and 6 6 more bottom.
Although a fewer number of bolts might also be acceptable, it was felt
that the modest incremental cost for all the bolts was justified by the
additional risk reduction that it would provide. This may be revisited
if the access studies indicate access limitations, but barring this, we
will proceed with all bolts. It was also recommended that the FDR for
the C-C interface design be decoupled from the tool development so that
this FDR can be held as soon as possible. |
Disposition
(check
one) |
Acceptable |
1 Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|