| Review
Title |
Modular Coil Inboard
Interface C-C FDR |
| Date |
4 February 2008 |
| Cognizant
Engineer |
Mike Cole |
|
Responsible Line Manager |
Brad Nelson |
|
Review Board Chairperson |
Larry Dudek |
|
Review Board Members |
Wayne Reiersen, Peter Titus,
Stephen Langish, Dave Williamson, HM Fan, Art Brooks, Mike Viola
|
|
Invitees |
Peter Titus, Dave
Williamson, Wayne Reiersen, Mike Williams, Stephen Langish, HM Fan, Art
Brooks, Mike Viola, Judy Malsbury, Jerry Levine, Jeff Makiel, Don Rej, Kevin Freudenberg, Brad Nelson, Mike Cole, Jim Lyons,
Hutch Neilson, John Boscoe, Bob Simmons, Phil Heitzenroeder, P.J.
Fogarty, Dave Williamson, Kevin Freudenberg, Frank Malinowski |
|
Attendees |
Larry Dudek, Mike Viola,
John Boscoe, Steve Langish, Frank Malinowski, Jeff Makiel, Don Rej, Art
Brooks, Tom Brown, Bob Simmons, Phil Heitzenroeder, Wayne Reiersen,
Kevin Freudenberg, Paul Fogarty, David Williamson |
|
Charge |
The charge
to the review committee is as follows:
1) Are the requirements defined? What is
the proposed design?
2) What are the results of access
studies?
3) Is the analysis consistent with the
proposed design?
4) Have prior design review chits been
addressed?
5) Have all technical, cost/schedule,
and safety risks been addressed? |
|
Design Review Material |
Announcement
Chits and Disposition
Presentation
Notes from Peer Review --Shim Update
DRAWINGS
se140-046-1-30
se140-055-1-30
se140-058-1-30
|
|
Review Board Report |
 |
|
Items Reviewed |
|
Sat |
Unsat |
Comments |
|
Appropriate requirements identified
|
X |
|
|
|
Development plans and schedules |
X |
|
|
|
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |
|
|
Not Presented |
|
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |
X |
|
|
|
Cost
objectives |
|
|
Not Presented |
|
Other
review objectives addressed
(Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |
|
|
|
|
Summary of Results
|
This review was
judged to be successful pending resolution of the concerns. While the
charge issues were addressed there were a few important areas identified
during the review that will require additional design / analysis time
and an additional peer review. The concerns identified were the access
to the inboard bushings for installation and removal, additional load
case for the analysis should be reviewed to validate the design and the
case of uneven friction on the pucks causing a net force on the carrier. |
|
Disposition
(check
one) |
1 Acceptable |
|
Acceptable pending resolution of concerns -
CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. |
|
1 Incomplete -
Additional design
work is required prior to another design review.
|
|
Cog Engineer Close-out
(check
when done) |
|
|
1
Action required by Disposition is complete |
|
