NCSX Web Pages  

Project | Management | Physics | Procurement | Manufacturing

NCSX FTP Sites  

Project FTP Server | Supplier FTP Server

Navigation Trail  

Engineering > Design Review > WBS 18
Review Title FPA Station 5 PDR
Date 11 March 2008
Cognizant Engineer Tom Brown
Responsible Line Manager Phil Heitzenroeder
Review Board Chairperson Jim Chrzanowski
Review Board Members Mike Viola, Erik Perry, Shawn Connolly, Kevin Freudenberg, Paul Goranson
Invitees Larry Dudek, Mike Cole, John Edwards, Hutch Neilson, Phil Heitzenroeder, Art Brooks, Mark Smith, Mike Viola, Erik Perry, Shawn Connolly, Kevin Freudenberg, Paul Goranson, Jim Chrzanowski
Attendees Jim Chrzanowski, Hutch Neilson, Phil Heitzenroeder, Mark Smith, Mike Viola, Erik Perry, Shawn Connolly Lew Morris, Art Brooks, Larry Dudek, Mike Coil, Paul Goranson, Kevin Freudenberg
Charge The charge to the review committee is as follows:

1) Are the requirements adequately defined and documented? Note: This does not

require a SRD because it is not part of the experimental facility.

However, the requirements will be defined and included as an addendum to

the Sequence Plan, which will be archived on the NCSX Web as part of

this review.

2) Is the design consistent with the requirements?

2) Are the design basis analyses and any supporting R&D documented and adequate?

3) Have the drawings and models been promoted to PD release level?

Design Review Material


Chits and Disposition


Review Board Report  
Items Reviewed

Sat Unsat


Appropriate requirements identified  
Development plans and schedules
Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA  
Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews   N/A No chits from previous reviews
Cost objectives  

Other review objectives addressed

(Attachment 4 of ENG-033)


Summary of Results

A PDR of the Assembly Station 5 was successfully presented by Tom Brown.  A review of the requirements as well as detail description of the support structure components was presented.  The fixture drawings are nearly complete, and the analysis of the loads and deflections was available. A number of chits were generated recommending some improvement to the design including additional outriggers and increasing the design safety factor to five since personnel will be inside or under the structure during various elements of the Station 5 activities.  Overall the review was deemed successful by the review committee pending resolution of the chits generated.


(check  one)

 1  Acceptable
  Acceptable pending resolution of concerns - CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation.
  1 Incomplete - Additional design work is required prior to another design review.

Cog Engineer Close-out

(check  when done)

 1 Action required by Disposition is complete

Privacy and Security Notice

Please forward comments and questions to the Webmaster