| Review
          Title | Vacuum Vessel Ports Peer 
        Review | 
      
        | Date | 29 January  2004 | 
      
        | Cognizant Engineer | Mike Cole | 
      
        | Responsible Line Manager | Phil Heitzenroeder | 
      
        | Review Board Chairperson | Larry Dudek | 
      
        | Review Board Members | Mike Viola, Geoff 
        Gettelfinger, Robert Simmons | 
      
        | Invited Attendees | Brad Stratton, Dave Johnson, 
        Dick Majeski, Paul Goranson, Dave Williamson, Brad Nelson | 
      
        | Other Attendees |  | 
      
        | Charge | Is the Vacuum Vessel port 
          arrangement (size, number, and location) adequate for the NCSX 
          program? | 
      
        | Design Review Material | 
        Announcement 
        
        Presentation   
        
        Chits and Project 
        Disposition | 
      
        | Review Board Report |   | 
      
        | Items Reviewed | 
           | Sat | Unsat | Comments | 
      
        | Appropriate requirements identified |   |  |  | 
      
        | Development plans and schedules |   |  | Not presented | 
      
        | Regulatory compliance including USQD and NEPA |   |   | Not Applicable | 
      
        | Disposition of CHITS from previous reviews |   |   | Not Applicable | 
      
        | Cost 
          objectives |   |   | Not presented | 
      
        | 
          Other 
          review objectives addressed 
          
          (Attachment 4 of ENG-033) |   |  |  | 
      
        | 
          Summary of Results | Assumptions: 
    The ports to be shown are 
    feasible, including adequate clearances to other component - during assembly (everything 
    at room temperature) - during operation (coils, 
    cold, VV at RT to 40c) -during bake-out (coils, 
    cold, VV at 350c) Mike Cole presented the 
    latest design for the port arrangement.  Twenty three chits were 
    generated from the review most of the chits and discussion concerned how to 
    best eliminate the remaining interference with the structure and coils.  
    The committee considerer the review successful pending resolution of the 
    chits.  Brad Nelson, will hold another review once the chits are 
    resolved.  
         | 
      
        | 
          Disposition 
          (check  one) |  Acceptable | 
      
        |  Acceptable pending resolution of concerns - 
    CHITS identified above must be resolved prior to installation. | 
      
        | Incomplete -
    Additional  work is required prior to another design review. | 
      
        | 
          Cog Engineer Close-out 
          (check  
           when done) |  | 
      
        |  Action required by Disposition is complete |